Biofuels: 'Irrational' and 'even worse than fossil fuels'
The UK's "unreasonable" usage of biofuels will cost drivers around ₤ 460 million over the next 12 months, a think tank states.
A report by Chatham House, external states the growing reliance on sustainable liquid fuels will likewise increase food rates.
The author states that biodiesel made from grease was worse for the climate than nonrenewable fuel sources.
Under EU law, external, biofuels are set to make up 5% of the UK's transportation fuel from today.
Since 2008, the UK has actually needed fuel suppliers to include a growing percentage of sustainable materials into the gas and diesel they supply. These biofuels are mainly ethanol distilled from corn and biodiesel made from rapeseed, utilized cooking oil and tallow.
Deep fried fuel
But research study performed for Chatham House states that reaching the 5% level implies that UK vehicle drivers will need to pay an additional ₤ 460m a year since of the higher cost of fuel at the pump and from filling up regularly as biofuels have a lower energy material.
The report state that if the UK is to meet its obligations to EU energy targets the expense to drivers is likely to rise to ₤ 1.3 bn per annum by 2020.
"It is difficult to discover any excellent news," Rob Bailey, senior research fellow at Chatham House, informed BBC News.
"Biofuels increase costs and they are an extremely expensive way to minimize carbon emissions," he stated.
The EU biofuel mandates are also having hugely distorting effects in the market. Because used cooking oil is considered among the most sustainable kinds of biodiesel, the cost for it has increased quickly. Rob Bailey says that towards completion of 2012 it was more expensive than refined palm oil.
"It develops a monetary reward to purchase refined palm oil, cook a chip in it to turn it into utilized cooking oil and then offer it at profit,"
"It is insane but the incentives are there."
There are also worries that taking EU land out of production to grow rapeseed oil in specific is producing more climate issues than it fixes. The more fuel of this type that is taken into vehicles the bigger the deficit created in the edible oils market. This had actually caused increased imports of palm oil from Indonesia, often produced on deforested land.
"Once you consider these indirect impacts, biofuels made from vegetable oils in fact result worldwide in more emissions than you would receive from using diesel in the very first place," stated Rob Bailey.
"Plus you are asking vehicle drivers to pay more for the fuel - it makes no sense, it is an entirely irrational strategy."
Biofuel advantages
The European Biodiesel Board (EBB), which represents the industry, external across the EU, stated it understood the issues brought on by the mandate. But it thinks that biofuels have many positives.
"Blaming biofuels for all the difficulties on the planet is a bit too exaggerated," stated Isabelle Maurizi, task manager at the EBB.
"It has actually brought lots of benefits. It has actually improved the security of our diesel; it has actually reduced EU reliance on animal feed imports, thanks to the rapeseed we grow for biodiesel."
"If there was no biodiesel farmers would just make their land idle - no food, no feed!"
As the UK hits the 5% of liquid fuels mark, the government faces some hard choices on how to progress on this problem as it faces tripling the costs for vehicle drivers by 2020.
Insiders recommend its choice would be to try and get agreement in Brussels on the effects of indirect costs which might constrain what counts as biofuel. However getting contract from nations with powerful farming sectors who gain from the current plan will be hard.
"When you have a lobby that includes the farming sector and the oil sector it is very hard for Governments to make a U-turn," said Rob Bailey.
County begins recycling chip fat
8 December 2010
How does Qantas fly on chip fat? Video, 00:02:00 How does Qantas fly on chip fat?
13 April 2012
Measuring energy crops' footprint
18 October 2012
